Still, as AI Gahaku suggests, the results do matter to some degree, especially in a culture as goal-oriented as America’s generally is. (That’s the whole idea behind Cage’s most famous experiment in aleatory music, 4’33” -essentially 4 minutes and 33 seconds of silence where whatever sounds popped up during that time were the “music.”) AI art of the kind pioneered by Obvious and AICAN appear to be similarly aleatory in nature, according to Dr. The pioneering 20th-century avant-garde composer John Cage, for instance, spent much of his career experimenting with the idea of “aleatory music,” or “chance music,” in which the music was dependent not on a fully notated score, but on whatever sonic elements were available at a given moment. There’s certainly precedence for this kind of thinking in other forms of arts & culture. For this reason, I have no doubt that AI-produced pieces are conceptual art, a form that dates back to the 1960s, in which the idea behind the work and the process is more important than the outcome.”
Elgammal wrote in the January-February 2019 issue of the magazine American Scientist, “one that involves an artist and a machine collaborating to explore new visual forms in revolutionary ways. Elgammal suggests that it’s not so much about the result as it is about how the result came about. (Courtesy: HG Contemporary)Įven if one doesn’t find the end products of these pieces of artificial intelligence-generated art all that interesting, Dr. Creative adversarial Network print on canvas, 58 x 58 in. The piece not only ended up at a Christie’s auction but also sold for $432,500, far surpassing any appraiser’s pre-auction estimates.ĪICAN + Ahmad Elgammal, Faceless Portrait #2.
WATATANI GAHAKU ART CODE
Perhaps the most notorious example of AI art that stirred the art world came in 2018 with “Portrait of Edmond de Belamy.” The “Portrait” was an artwork created not by a single artist, but by a French collective named Obvious, whose members didn’t even create the algorithm that generated the work but instead altered an existing developer’s code to come up with the Renaissance-like portrait. In fact, AI art has been part of the art world for the past few years now, albeit not to quite the degree of mainstream acceptance that Sato’s creation has achieved in the past week or so. But AI art of the kind AI Gahaku traffics in isn’t exactly a new phenomenon. All of the filters look like variations of portraits by Leonardo da Vinci, Michelangelo, Albrecht Dürer, and other such famous Renaissance-era artists.ĪI Gahaku might seem like little more than a classier version of, say, Instagram, which has a variety of filters to give your run-of-the-mill smartphone pictures a more “artistic” look.
WATATANI GAHAKU ART SOFTWARE
He has come up with ten different styles to choose from when you upload your selfie and the software that analyzes the photo. (Courtesy: AI Gahaku)ĪI Gahaku is the creation of a Japanese full-stack developer named Sato. AI Gahaku is, in fact, an AI artist who will create Renaissance-style paintings based on the selfies you submit.īelow, for instance, is an artwork generated by AI Gahaku based on a selfie taken by the author of this article a few months ago:ĪI Gahaku, Kenji Self-Portrait. Selfies are also involved with this particular app, but this one’s not just about matching your face with existing works of art.
Recently, the next logical step in this kind of AI-based art appreciation appeared online in the form of AI Gahaku.
Sometimes the matches were eerily accurate, and sometimes they were hilariously off-base. For about a week, you couldn’t escape people posting side-by-side photos of themselves next to Google’s chosen artwork match. Remember Google Arts & Culture’s Face Match ? Back in 2018, Google’s Arts & Culture app-which primarily exists to give users access to a ton of famous works of art at their fingertips-briefly went viral thanks to a particular feature that allowed users to upload selfies, which the app would then match with existing artwork. Screenshot of Google Arts & Culture Art Selfie Webpage.
0 kommentar(er)
